tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6267813899560041797.post5584448454909502371..comments2023-12-24T12:58:27.328+02:00Comments on Mark Cogitates: Cardinal Napier On The Bible Debate (Amended)Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07098007440868887687noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6267813899560041797.post-60593625237466744332012-04-12T23:16:12.897+02:002012-04-12T23:16:12.897+02:00OK! You have been asked to remove the Cardinal'...OK! You have been asked to remove the Cardinal's letter i.e hide the truth away!<br /><br />Now, certainly, it is not infringing upon the copyright, when one relates what the Cardinal expressed. <br /><br />He said that the reason for the Church promoting the RSV version as opposed to the NRSV version is that the NRSV version (promoted by the Southern Cross) ACTUALLY promotes a scriptrure interpretation which contrary to Church doctrine, which is not in the spirit of the Liturgy.<br /><br />Does the Southern Cross not want your readers to know that it is promoting dissent by fostering the the NRSV version?<br /><br />By asking you to withdraw the Cardinal's letter, I would say, that the Southern Cross has fired the second shot in its own foot!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6267813899560041797.post-35329833899304192672012-04-12T13:13:22.895+02:002012-04-12T13:13:22.895+02:00Well what can we say about the Southern Cross? It ...Well what can we say about the Southern Cross? It always seems to be trumping with the wrong cards! Jokers wild and shooting itself in the foot when it loses the game!<br /><br />I have always wondered why they have still not been kicked into touch! Is it because somebody wishes to undermine the Catholic Faith and the Faithful?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com