 |
| Cardinal Napier |
Cardinal Napier’s recent interview with Stephen Nolan, which was broadcast on BBC Radio 5 Live on Friday, 15 March 2013,
has caused a great deal of controversy.
Why? Well, exactly what other kind
of reaction would one honestly expect to this: “Cardinal Napier Says Paedophilia Is Not Criminal”.
This headline was intended to do exactly
that. Cause controversy.
This is what has become of the media
today. Phrases like ‘journalistic
integrity’ refer to ideals that died a slow miserable death years ago. Today journalists and their editor’s have
only one objective and sadly it is not to tell the truth.
Journalists and their editor’s sole
objective today is to generate revenue. If
they are able to combine truth with that objective, then that is a happy
coincidence. This leads to fallacious headlines,
such as the one above, and to inaccurate reporting.
In order to attract more readers and
listeners, Cardinal Napier’s good name and reputation was offered as a sacrifice
by the media. He paid the price for their need to have a successful weekend of broadcasting and print, and they don’t give a damn
about him or anyone else they hurt while doing so.
The full interview with Cardinal Napier, not
the deceptive little snippets that have been made available by most of the
media, plus a full transcript of the interview can be found here - Transcript: ‘Controversial’ Cardinal Napier Interview.
Cardinal Napier makes it quite clear during
the interview that he is not saying that an offence against a child is not
criminal. Cardinal Napier actually says
very specifically to Stephen Nolan: “you’re
trying to say that I am minimising the seriousness of the cases … that I am
saying that somebody who has offended – who has committed an offence against a
child is not criminally liable. I am
not saying anything of the kind.”[1]
Stephen Nolan is however quite clearly
deliberately simpleminded during the entire interview. Despite Cardinal Napier repeatedly making the
point that paedophilia is a medical or psychiatric disorder, Stephen Nolan
pertinaciously ignores this.
A quick search of the Internet will reveal
that paedophilia is indeed considered by medical professionals to be a
disorder. Cardinal Napier is therefore
not wrong in approaching the subject with this understanding and indeed, in my
opinion, he is being accurate and entirely correct by doing so.
Wikipedia opens the subject of paedophilia
with this statement: “As a medical
diagnosis, pedophilia, or paedophilia, is a psychiatric disorder in persons 16
years of age or older typically characterized by a primary or exclusive sexual
interest toward prepubescent children.”[2]
Even though Cardinal Napier is clear that he
is referring to only someone who suffers from the paedophilia disorder and not to
all child abusers, Nolan exasperatingly continues with this highly erroneous
perspective that a child abuser is always a paedophile and that a paedophile is
always a child abuser.
What happened in this interview is evident. Stephen
Nolan spun Cardinal Napier’s use of ‘paedophile’ to mean all ‘child abusers’. This even though clearly it was not what
Cardinal Napier was saying.
Stephen Nolan cannot claim that he does not
know that professionals have for a long time strongly recommended: “that these imprecise uses be avoided because
although people who commit child sexual abuse commonly exhibit the disorder, some
offenders do not meet the clinical diagnosis standards for pedophilia”.[3]
It is evident from listening to the entire
interview that Cardinal Napier means paedophile in the strict
sense of it being a person who suffers from the ‘paedophilia disorder’. Cardinal Napier's message is clear. If a person is found by professionals to be incapable of being held criminally liable for their actions due to them suffering from paedophilia and the court agrees, who is he to decide that they must be punished and held criminally liable.
Stephen Nolan knows exactly what Cardinal
Napier means and understands exactly what Cardinal Napier is saying. Yet, as Cardinal Napier himself rightly
points out, Stephen Nolan came into this interview with a hidden and sinister
agenda.
Stephen Nolan confirmed during the interview
that he had invited Cardinal Napier onto his show to discuss the election of
Pope Francis.[4] Yet Nolan spent literally only 1 minute 45
seconds of the 17-minute interview on that subject. Clearly Nolan lied about the purpose of the
interview.
 |
| Stephen Nolan |
Stephen Nolan is not in the least bit
interested in listening to and hearing his guest. Nolan’s only interest is in getting a
controversial statement that will draw attention to himself and his show.
Cardinal Napier quite rightly says to Stephen
Nolan during the interview: “you’re
trying to get me to say things that are going to go according to the way you
would like them to go”[5].
Stephen Nolan personifies what is wrong with
journalism and the media today. No
person, having heard the entire interview, could possibly have any doubt that
Cardinal Napier did not say that child abuse is not criminal. Nolan, the BBC and every other media
outlet that sold to their audience that fallacious by-line about Cardinal
Napier demonstrated to us that the media will do anything to drive revenue - manipulate, hack phones, lie . . .
