A friend suggested I write a post to explain
what Lay Eucharistic Ministers may do. He felt it might be helpful for some. I
have often heard these lay people being referred to as “Lay Eucharistic
Ministers” or “Extraordinary Ministers of the Eucharist” or even just
“Eucharistic Ministers”. I agreed, so here I go. Question: What may “Extraordinary Ministers of the Eucharist” or
“Lay Eucharistic Ministers” do? Answer:
Nothing. (I am done with the post!)
He was obviously not amused at this answer
until I explained the reason for the answer to him. You see, there is in fact no
such thing as an “Extraordinary Minister of the Eucharist” or a “Lay
Eucharistic Minister”. So, I cannot explain what they may do because they simply
do not exist.
“…"the only minister who can confect the Sacrament of the Eucharist
in persona Christi is a validly ordained Priest”. Hence the name “minister of the Eucharist” belongs properly to the Priest
alone. Moreover, also by reason of their sacred Ordination, the ordinary
ministers of Holy Communion are the Bishop, the Priest and the Deacon, to
whom it belongs therefore to administer Holy Communion to the lay members of
Christ’s faithful during the celebration of Mass.”[1]
“This function is to be understood strictly according to the name by
which it is known, that is to say, that of extraordinary minister of Holy
Communion, and not “special
minister of Holy Communion” nor “extraordinary minister of the Eucharist” nor
“special minister of the Eucharist”, by which names the meaning of this
function is unnecessarily and improperly broadened.”[2]
So, when a member of the laity is used to
distribute Holy Communion, the correct and only term to use when referring to
that person is “Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion”.
Sadly, it seems that Extraordinary Ministers
of Holy Communion have taken on plague like proportions within many parishes in
South Africa. Although, I am sure, this is not common only to South Africa. I
sometimes get the impression that it is used, by some parish priests, almost like
a reward or recognition system for the laity in the parish. I have even been
present when a perfectly healthy, young, able-bodied priest sat doing nothing
while Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion distributed Holy Communion.
“Indeed, the extraordinary minister of Holy Communion may administer
Communion only when the Priest and Deacon are lacking, when the
Priest is prevented by weakness or advanced age or some other genuine reason,
or when the number of faithful coming to Communion is so great that
the very celebration of Mass would be unduly prolonged. This, however,
is to be understood in such a way that a brief prolongation, considering
the circumstances and culture of the place, is not at all a sufficient
reason.”[3]
I must say that I have yet to find a parish,
which made use of Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion during Mass, where
this was truly needed. In the worst scenario that I experienced, Mass, by my
calculation, would have taken 10 minutes longer than it did. Ten minutes surely
is not to be considered “undue
prolongation”.
It is clear that a blurring of the lines has
occurred in some parishes and that Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion are
being treated almost as though they are part of the clergy. One example of this
blurring of the lines is the practice of the Extraordinary Ministers of Holy
Communion joining the priest in the sanctuary before the priest has received Holy Communion. I have even witnessed Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion
receiving Holy Communion together with the priest, like concelebrants would.
“These ministers should not approach the altar before the priest has
received Communion, and they are always to receive from the hands of the
priest celebrant the vessel containing either species of the Most Holy
Eucharist for distribution to the faithful.”[4]
Then of course there is also the practice of
the Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion consuming the remaining Precious
Blood at the credence table after Holy Communion. Added to this is the practice
that Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion are assigned the task of
purifying the sacred vessels, either during Mass or immediately after Mass.
These practices are both specifically forbidden.
“The sacred vessels are purified by the priest, the deacon, or an
instituted acolyte after Communion or after Mass, insofar as possible at
the credence table. … Care must be taken that whatever may remain
of the Blood of Christ after the distribution of Communion is consumed
immediately and completely at the altar.”[5]
In closing, I must of course touch on the
distribution of Holy Communion to the sick and another erroneous practice. When
an Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion will be used to take Holy Communion
to the sick, the pyx, containing the Blessed Sacrament, must be given to the
Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion, by the priest or deacon, after
distribution of Holy Communion has been completed during Mass.
The Extraordinary Minister
of the Holy Communion must then leave the church immediately and go directly to
the sick person. The Extraordinary Minister of the Holy Communion does not stay
until the end of Mass and most certainly does not join the rest of parishioners
for tea after Mass. Furthermore, the Extraordinary Minister of the Holy
Communion most certainly may not take the pyx, containing the Blessed
Sacrament, anywhere other than directly to the sick person. (It cannot be taken
home overnight or carried around while doing “other things” until a convenient
time arrives for distributing it to the sick person.)
“No one may carry the Most Holy Eucharist to his or her home, or to any
other place contrary to the norm of law.”[6]
“A Priest or Deacon, or an extraordinary minister who takes the Most
Holy Eucharist when an ordained minister is absent or impeded in order to
administer it as Communion for a sick person, should go insofar as possible
directly from the place where the Sacrament is reserved to the sick person’s
home, leaving aside any profane business so that any danger of profanation may
be avoided and the greatest reverence for the Body of Christ may be ensured.
Furthermore the Rite for the administration of Communion to the sick, as
prescribed in the Roman Ritual, is always to be used.”[7]
Excellent post. I was coming in to correct you and was about to mention the very same thing!
ReplyDeleteWow, this artіcle is fаѕtidious, my ѕisteг
ReplyDeleteis analyzing thеse kinԁѕ of thingѕ,
ѕo I am gοing to let know her.
Feel free to surf to my wеbsite ... http://wiki.uwcs.Co.uk/ValarieNGA
You again! I'm starting to like your blog :-)
ReplyDeleteThanks Michelle. I have been a lazy writer. Glad you have enjoyed some of what I have written. God bless you.
ReplyDelete