The Benedíctus antiphon, during Lauds for
this morning, the memorial of Saints Timothy and Titus, reads:
“Proclaim the message and, welcome or unwelcome, insist on it. Refute
falsehood, correct error, call to obedience – but always with patience and the
intention of teaching.”
These words were particularly notable to me
today, specifically because of an article I read, which was sent to me yesterday,
titled “The unconscionable consequences of conscience exemptions”. The article was written
by Jamie Manson and, not
surprisingly, appeared in the National Catholic Reporter. I am not sure that a truly Catholic newspaper would have
published it.
Just as an aside, the National Catholic
Reporter, in my opinion, is not a Catholic newspaper, regardless of what its
name may imply! One only has to flip through its content to realise that it has
a seriously poisonous character. So poisonous in fact that, as far back as
1968, Bishop Helmsing charged this newspaper with heresy[1] and asked that it remove
the word “Catholic” from its name. The newspaper clearly chose to simply ignore
the Bishop’s request, much as it, and many of its contributors, clearly still
does today, regarding anything that the Church teaches.
The article, by Ms. Manson, is about the legislation
introduced by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). This
legislation requires that every health plan, even those that are Catholic, provide
all FDA-approved contraceptives, including some that can cause abortions. I previously
wrote about this on my Blog in a post titled, “Start Defending The Church”.
The article is long and filled with complete
nonsense. Ms. Manson makes some incredibly unbelievable statements in her
article. I have no intention whatsoever of addressing all the drivel in it.
You’re welcome to waste 30 minutes reading it. I would however like to touch on
two comments that she makes.
The first is a reaction to her statement that
the introduction of this legislation, by the Obama administration, “is a promising attempt to prevent unwanted
pregnancies and offers perhaps the most ethical and realistic approach to
reducing the abortion rate.”[2]
I am just totally amazed at how she could possibly
reach this conclusion? All the evidence points in the exact opposite direction.
Despite the increased availability of contraception and sex education, abortion
rates, according to the Guttmacher Institute, have shown a steady average annual increase of about 3.3% during
the period 1973 to 2008. Compare that to a population increase in the USA of
only 1.4% per annum during the same period. The USA is killing babies at rates
that are growing 135% quicker per annum than the actual population growth of
the USA.
In addition to the fact that the number of abortions has continued to grow, at rates that exceed population growth in the USA,
contraception has also caused another alarming growth, which is in itself an indication of the great horrors that are still to come for innocent little babies.
Today, 66% more teenagers are having sex,
than was the case in 1971. So, the only thing that contraception and sex
education really seems to have achieved, is that now teenagers, more than ever before,
believe they can safely have sex, without having to worry about the consequences.
Not only have the number of abortions increased, but we have also, at the same
time, managed to successfully increase the number of teenage girls who are at
risk of having an unwanted pregnancy.
Ms. Manson later in her article has the
audacity to call this legislation “a
groundbreaking move to protect women…” Sorry Ms. Manson, but, just exactly
how is putting our daughters under increasing pressure to have sex, because of
the availability of contraception, a move to protect women?
These are not difficult stats to understand.
The story they tell is easy to grasp. Contraception is not gaining us any
ground in this fight against evil. How can anyone possibly claim that this
legislation, introduced by the Obama administration, is “promising” and “realistic”?
Contraception is not working and it is clearly not the answer. An increase in
moral values and self-control is the only answer!
The second comment I would like to address
is Ms. Manson’s scathing attack on the Church hierarchy, while defending the
Obama administration. She says, amongst many other things:
“The bishops' reaction was characterized by increasingly typical cries
of victimization and hysteria. This self-pity only further diminishes the
seriousness with which U.S. Catholics take the hierarchy. The sad truth is, if
the numbers of Catholics leaving the church are any indication, most Catholics
in the United States probably see the hierarchy more as victimizers than
victimized.”[3]
Ms. Manson should know that it takes great
courage to reject popular opinion and to defend the truth. She, after all, has
clearly decided that she does not have the stomach to defend the truth taught
by the Church. She has chosen instead to abandon the truth and has chosen
popularity as the alternative.
Rather than being ostracised by society for
teaching the truth, she would much rather join the hoards, who ridicule and
denounce the alleged “unethical” and “unrealistic” truths taught by the Church
and hence her ridiculous article. It reminds me a bit of this passage from the
bible:
“After a little while the bystanders came up and said to Peter,
"Certainly you are also one of them, for your accent betrays you."
Then he began to invoke a curse on himself and to swear, "I do
not know the man." And immediately the cock crowed.
And Peter remembered the saying of Jesus, "Before the cock
crows, you will deny me three times." And he went out and wept bitterly.”[4]
If only Ms. Manson, and her cronies, would
have the courage of their convictions to actually walk away from the Church?
This is not very likely though. The “sad
truth” is that Ms. Manson and her cronies clearly depend on Catholics for
their living. If they didn’t, why would they, in this free society in which we
live, choose to remain the poor “victims”
of their “victimisers”, the Church
hierarchy? Ms. Manson, I think it is in fact you and not the bishops, who is
guilty of “hysteria” and “self-pity”.
I intend to increase my prayers, for the
bishops throughout the world, so that they will grow in wisdom and courage to
defend the truths taught by the Church. I pray also that more Catholics will
have the courage to show them our support in the face of attacks from people like
Ms. Manson. I will also pray for Ms. Manson.
I would like to end with the reading from
Lauds this morning:
“Remember your leaders, those who spoke to you the word of God; consider
the outcome of their life, and imitate their faith. Jesus Christ is the same
yesterday and today and for ever. Do not be led away by diverse and strange
teachings.”[5]
[1] National Catholic Reporter, Bishop Helmsing charges Heresy, October 16, 1968: Recovered Jan 26, 2012
[2]
Manson JL, National Catholic
Reporter, The unconscionable consequences of conscience exemptions,
Jan 25, 2012
I really love this article Mark, especially the quotes from the Benedictus antiphon. It reminds me that despite what learned people’s opinions might be on matters of faith and Church, whether they be theologians, scientists, newspaper writers (Supposedly Catholic or secular) or even the ordinary Joe, I should always look to the Church Herself, its good priests and bishops and the good Pope for the Truth as revealed in Christ Jesus the Lord.
ReplyDeleteIt gives me a great feeling of hope that no matter how confusing the world might be, no matter how different people’s views on important matters are, I can always find Christ and His love, His care and true teachings in the Catholic Church.